<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wassup &#187; Digital Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wassup.myblog.sg/category/digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wassup.myblog.sg</link>
	<description>My Thoughts on Wat's Up Around Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lumix LX3</title>
		<link>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2009/05/13/lumix-lx3/</link>
		<comments>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2009/05/13/lumix-lx3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wassup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LX3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wassup.myblog.sg/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am very happy with my Panasonic Lumix LX3. I bought it last October. The LX3 takes great picture and has been my &#8220;default&#8221; camera ever since. I like the fast ultra-wide angle zoom lens by Leica &#8211; 24-60mm/F2.0-2.8 (35mm equiv.). 


I used it to take landscape, scenery, sunset, people, food and etc.



More and better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" title="Lumix LX3" href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08072102panasoniclx3.asp"><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/lumix-lx3_s.jpg" alt="Lumix LX3" width="108" height="69" class="alignright size-full wp-image-478" border="0" /></a>I am very happy with my Panasonic <strong>Lumix LX3</strong>. I bought it last October. The LX3 takes great picture and has been my &#8220;default&#8221; camera ever since. I like the fast ultra-wide angle zoom lens by Leica &#8211; 24-60mm/F2.0-2.8 (35mm equiv.). <span id="more-475"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/p1010337.jpg" alt="Sunset" width="425" height="266" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-483" /></p>
<p>I used it to take landscape, scenery, sunset, people, food and etc.</p>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/p1010239.jpg" alt="Landscape open field" width="425" height="240" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-481" /></p>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/p1000697.jpg" alt="Kundasang roadside stall" width="425" height="319" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-484" /></p>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/p1010100.jpg" alt="Beef @ Waraku Restaurant" width="425" height="319" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-486" /></p>
<p>More and better resolution pictures at my <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shihengcheong/sets/72157618075108728/">Flickr LX3 Photostream</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2009/05/13/lumix-lx3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FX Lenses for Nikon D700</title>
		<link>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2009/05/08/nikon-fx-lenses-for-d700/</link>
		<comments>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2009/05/08/nikon-fx-lenses-for-d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wassup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wassup.myblog.sg/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ There is no such thing as FX lenses for D700, D3 or D3x! FX is the format of the Nikon camera body. Nikon FX DSLR has an image sensor that is larger than the DX format. So you want to use a Nikkor lens that gives you the full frame. 
The Original FX Trilogy
Back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/d700/"><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/d700_50mmf14_s.jpg" alt="Nikon D700 with 50mm/f1.4 lens" width="100" height="94" class="alignright size-full wp-image-361" border="0" /></a> There is no such thing as <em>FX lenses for D700</em>, D3 or D3x! FX is the format of the Nikon camera body. Nikon FX DSLR has an image sensor that is larger than the DX format. So you want to use a Nikkor lens that gives you the full frame. <span id="more-357"></span></p>
<h3>The Original FX Trilogy</h3>
<p>Back in 2007, when Nikon launched the first FX format DSLR &#8211; D3, it also rolled out two new lenses, and bundled it with an older lens; many call these 3 lenses the &#8216;FX Trilogy&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED</li>
<li>AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED</li>
<li>AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/nikon_fx_lens_trilogy.jpg" alt="Nikon FX Lens Trilogy" width="425" height="442" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-367" /></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<h3>Image Sensor: Nikon FX vs Nikon DX</h3>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2009/05/d700_fx_sensor.jpg" alt="Nikon D700 FX Image Sensor" width="400" height="316" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-364" /></p>
<table align="center" border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" width="405">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Format</strong></td>
<td align="center"><strong>Image Sensor Size, mm</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nikon FX</strong></td>
<td align="center">36.0 x 23.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Nikon DX</strong></td>
<td align="center">23.6 x 15.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Those numbers work out to be 131% larger area for FX than DX format. More area to pack more pixels resulting on lesser noise.</p>
<p>When you use a DX lens on a FX camera, the resulting image is smaller than the FX image sensor area and you&#8217;ll get a cropped picture with lesser pixels and lower resolution. This wastes much of the capability of the FX cameras.</p>
<h3>Use Non-DX Lens on Your D700</h3>
<p>All non-DX lenses, older AF or manual focus, will give you full frame image on the FX format DSLR.</p>
<p>In other words, <strong>non-DX lenses are FX lenses</strong>!</p>
<p>You can really get amazingly good picture with the right lens on the Nikon D700! Here&#8217;s a video comparing D700 vs F5 using the same 85mm/F1.8 lens. So you see, you can use your good old Nikkor AF lens on the new D700 to get even better result.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2-z-9te6y4k&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2-z-9te6y4k&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><!--adsense#468x60--></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2009/05/08/nikon-fx-lenses-for-d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8MP Camera Phones Shootout</title>
		<link>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/12/17/8mp-camera-phones-shootout/</link>
		<comments>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/12/17/8mp-camera-phones-shootout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wassup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C905]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG Renoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wassup.myblog.sg/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Digital Life features what I&#8217;ve been looking forward to &#8211; the latest 8MP camera phones review on the LG Renoir, Samsung Innova8, Samsung Pixon and Sony Ericsson C905. And according to the author, the winner is Sony Ericsson C905 aka Cybershot C905.

Why the Sony Ericsson C905

All the 4 camera phones were tested for outdoors, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2008/12/samsung_pixon_black.jpg" alt="Samsung Pixon" width="68" height="86" class="alignright size-full wp-image-212" />Today, Digital Life features what I&#8217;ve been looking forward to &#8211; the latest <em>8MP camera phones review</em> on the <em>LG Renoir</em>, <em>Samsung Innova8</em>, <em>Samsung Pixon</em> and <em>Sony Ericsson C905</em>. And according to the author, the winner is <span id="more-211"></span><strong>Sony Ericsson C905</strong> aka <strong>Cybershot C905</strong>.</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<h3>Why the Sony Ericsson C905</h3>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2008/12/sony_c905.jpg" alt="Sony Ericsson C905" width="283" height="190" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-213" /></p>
<p>All the 4 camera phones were tested for outdoors, close-up, low-light and fast-motion shots. The Sony C905 came up first in 3 of the categories and third for fast-motion or action photography. The 2 seconds shutter lag seemed to be quite a problem. However, if you want sharp picture with the right exposure and color temperature then Sony C905 is the champion.</p>
<h3>Samsung Pixon M8800</h3>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2008/12/samsung_pixon_m8800.jpg" alt="Samsung Pixon M8800" width="282" height="268" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-214" /></p>
<p>The Samsung scored #1 for fast-motion photography, #2 for outdoors and low-light, and #3 for close-up shot. From the series of 4 test, I would think it ranked #2 overall.</p>
<p>If you are looking for the fastest 8MP camera phone then the Samsung Pixon&#8217;s 1 second shutter response will ensure that you don&#8217;t miss that fleeting moment.</p>
<h3>Youtube: Samsung Pixon Design &amp; Interface</h3>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mt5F3_g3l0s&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mt5F3_g3l0s&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<h3>LG Renoir</h3>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2008/12/lg_renoir_kc910.jpg" alt="LG Renoir" width="155" height="142" class="alignright size-full wp-image-215" />The LG Renoir KC910 is the weakest of all. The Renoir was #4 for outdoors, close-up and low-light. In terms of response, it is #2 &#8211; just a fraction of a second slower than the Pixon.</p>
<p>It is apparent that if you are going for the sharpest and fastest 8MP camera phone then the $888 LG Renoir will not be the like candidate because you can get the Pixon for $10 more and the C905 for an additional $50.</p>
<h3>Prices of 8MP Camera Phones</h3>
<p>The following are retail prices in Singapore Dollars without contract:</p>
<ul>
<li>Price of Sony Ericsson C905 &#8211; $938</li>
<li>Price of Samsung Pixon M8800 &#8211; $898</li>
<li>Price of Samsung Innov8 i8510 &#8211; $1,098</li>
<li>Price of LG Renoir KC910 &#8211; $999</li>
</ul>
<h3>8MP Camera Phones Shootout Results</h3>
<p><img src="http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2008/12/8mp_camera_phone_shootout.jpg" alt="8MP Camera Phones Shootout Result" width="389" height="120" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-216" /></p>
<p><!--adsense#img--></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/12/17/8mp-camera-phones-shootout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube High Quality How-to</title>
		<link>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/05/08/youtube-high-quality-how-to/</link>
		<comments>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/05/08/youtube-high-quality-how-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wassup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybershot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony T100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Movie Maker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/05/08/youtube-high-quality-how-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning I found out that some of my Youtube videos can be viewed in high quality. Despite the need for higher bandwidth, Youtube high quality videos look and sound so much better. 

YouTube High Quality Videos with Sony T100
The Sony Cybershot DSC T100 digital camera is not a new model, I have been using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I found out that some of my Youtube videos can be viewed in high quality. Despite the need for higher bandwidth, <strong>Youtube high quality videos</strong> look and sound so much better. <span id="more-71"></span></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<h3>YouTube High Quality Videos with Sony T100</h3>
<p>The <em>Sony Cybershot DSC T100</em> digital camera is not a new model, I have been using it for more than 1 year.</p>
<div align="center"><strong>Guide to Sony T100</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8K5yjubcXzM&#038;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8K5yjubcXzM&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
</div>
<p>So far I am happy with the videos and  photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot digital camera. In fact, I prefer using my little red T100 to my Olympus DSLR when it comes to group and candid shot.</p>
<h3>High Quality Video Settings for Sony T100</h3>
<p>To take high quality video for YouTube, you will need to set the T100 to Movie Mode and then select <strong>Image Size</strong> to <strong>640(Fine)</strong>.</p>
<p>I would recommend to have at least 2GB of memory if you attempt to take high quality video at 640(Fine) and still want to have space for still photos.</p>
<h3>Memory Capacity for High Quality Videos</h3>
<p>I am using a SanDisk 4GB <strong>Memory Stick PRO Duo</strong> (MSPD) which I bought at the recent <a href="http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/03/02/it-show-singapore/">IT Show in Singapore</a>. With a 4GB MSPD, I can record up to 52 minutes high quality video in 640(Fine) mode or 3 hours in 640(Standard) mode!</p>
<h3>Windows Movie Maker &amp; WMV</h3>
<p>If you are using Windows Movie Maker to edit your video before uploading to YouTube, you have to take note of the settings when you video is saved in <strong>Microsoft&#8217;s WMV format</strong>.</p>
<div align="center">
<img src='http://wassup.myblog.sg/files/2008/05/windows_movie_maker_setting.jpg' alt='Windows Movie Maker high quality video settings' />
</div>
<p>When saving the final edited movie as <strong>WMV</strong> for uploading to Youtube, choose &#8220;Other settings:&#8221; and &#8220;Video for LAN(1 Mbps)&#8221; or &#8220;Video for Local Playback(1.5 Mbps)&#8221;.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the minimum settings at a glance:</p>
<p>1. File type: Windows Media Video (WMV)<br />
2. Bit rate: 1Mbps<br />
3. Display size: 640 x 480 pixels<br />
4. Aspect ratio: 4:3<br />
5. Frame per second: 30</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wassup.myblog.sg/2008/05/08/youtube-high-quality-how-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
